MYTHS and TRUTHS OF THE HOLOCAUST
Ever hear about the lamp shades made from Jewish skin during World War II?
That was proven false yet you still think it's true
Ever hear about the soap made from dead Jews?
|At the International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg in 1945, the Soviet Union charged that the Nazis had made soap from human fat. Soap that was allegedly made from human fat was displayed in the court room.|
The photo below shows the soap that was shown at the IMT.Soap allegedly made from human fat
At Nuremberg, the Constitution of the International Military Tribunal included the following:
V. POWERS OF THE TRIBUNAL AND CONDUCT OF THE TRIAL
Article 21. The Tribunal shall not require proof of facts of common knowledge but shall take judicial notice thereof.
The making of human soap by the Germans was common knowledge that did not require any proof, so the Soviet Union was not required to furnish a forensic report as evidence.
Common knowledge! By who? Our ally the communists? How ridiculous! It would take 45 years for this myth to be busted!
Yet did you know it was busted?
Jewish propaganda perpetuated the lie but not the truth
Oops -- sorry, we made a mistake. Too late to give the German soldier his dignity back
Soap story was a heinous lie
You can believe the soap and lamp shades were false because those stories were so far-fetched anyway.
The gas chambers...this you still believe
The six million dead figure...this you still believe
That Hitler wanted to exterminate the Jews...this you still believe
Jews died -- but how many -- and why
Just by stating that the Holocaust has myths, we're considered hateful, racist, bigots, anti-Semitic...Neo-Nazi...you get the idea.
Truth is not hateful -- Facts are not anti-Semitic
We are not denying that Jews died
We are not denying that there were crematoria
What we are asking is
Why did the Jews die and what were the crematoria used for
Before you read further, make sure you've read the German History section of this site and accompanying site links.
It probably would be a good idea to have read all of the Jewish Issues section as well
It's very important to know -- who is a Jew?
Click here for the FACTS about...
Can you name one people throughout recorded time who hasn't suffered hardships sometime in their history? Of course not. The black death swept Europe. Famine has wiped out millions in Africa. Just a a few years ago a massive tsunami killed well over 230,000 in Asia. January of 2010 the same amount died in an earthquake in Haiti. People suffer hardships.
But the Jews keep score. They have made it their racial "heritage" to have a "tradition" of persecution, whether real or imagined.
Christians better be sympathetic
What is so ironic is that the Jew of today is not related to the Hebrew of the Bible...they know it and count on you not knowing.
The Jews depend on your ignorance for their very existence
So like Pavlov's dogs, as soon as you start criticizing anything having to do with the Jews you're immediately labeled "anti-Jew" or "anti-Semitic." In America today practically nothing is worse. People would rather be called racist than "anti-Semitic."
The result of this has been that no one has the courage to be truthful about Jewish issues. In America we can tell the truth about practically anything else. We can talk about how the White people subjugated and disenfranchised millions of people of color, whether they were Indians, Blacks, Chinese...doesn't matter. We talk about it all the time.
In America we talk about the Ku Klux Klan and their reign of terror. We talk about Hitler constantly. Christians are made fun of on a regular basis. In movies, TV, in the print media. White Christians are the brunt of jokes and the subject of ridicule.
If a White person is found to be racist, that's bad. They have to apologize.
But if a person is found to be "anti-Semitic," Watch out!
Just ask Mel Gibson how his career is going
he's groveled -- he may find "redemption"
Don't you dare say one word against a Jew!
Six million died -- it's anti-Semitic to say otherwise
If you're really about seeking truth, you'll read this page and the ones linked to it.
People who are considered "revisionist" historians put forth eight claims where the "holocaust" is concerned. They do not claim that Jews didn't die. Nor do they deny that there were crematoria at concentration camps. They simply dispute the number of deaths and the way they died.
Most of this information came from www.zundelsite.org. Many references are made to the Holocaust Trial of Ernst Zundel. Read the book about his trial called The Great Holocaust Trial by Michael Hoffman II. It's a real eye opener.
Holocaust Revisionist Claim One:
The Holocaust is useful postwar propaganda that started as a systematic, insidious campaign during World War II as one of the tactics employed by moneyed interests to rally the troops and engage the world, specifically America, in what turned out to be, essentially, a fratricidal war.
The principle behind this propaganda was: "Let's get an enemy to kill an enemy."
How was this done? In old-fashioned, time-tested ways.
Sophisticated war-time propaganda about an enemy's alleged "atrocities" is nothing new. It is an effective psychological weapon, routinely employed to keep the home-grown troops fired up so that they believe that they are fighting for a righteous, patriotic cause. The enemy is demonized with systematic atrocity stories. The media repeats over and over and over again how cruel and demonic he is.
This tactic was used by the Allies - extensively. Here is one piece of evidence:
On February 29, 1944 the British Ministry of Information sent the following note to the higher British clergy and to the BBC:
I am directed by the Ministry to send you the following circular letter:
It is often the duty of the good citizens and of the pious Christians to turn a blind eye on the peculiarities of those associated with us.
But the time comes when such peculiarities, while still denied in public, must be taken into account when action by us is called for.
We know the methods of rule employed by the Bolshevik dictator in Russia itself from, for example, the writing and speeches of the Prime Minister himself during the last twenty years. We know how the Red Army behaved in Poland in 1920 and in Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Galicia, and Bessarabia only recently.
We must, therefore, take into account how the Red Army will certainly behave when it overruns Central Europe. Unless precautions are taken, the obviously inevitable horrors which will result will throw an undue strain on public opinion in this country.
We cannot reform the Bolsheviks but we can do our best to save them - and ourselves - from the consequences of their acts. The disclosures of the past quarter of the past quarter of a century will render mere denials unconvincing. The only alternative to denial is to distract public attention from the whole subject.
Experience has shown that the best distraction is atrocity propaganda directed against the enemy. Unfortunately the public is no longer so susceptible as in the days of "Corpse Factory." the Mutilated Belgian Babies," and the "Crucified Canadians."
Your cooperation is therefore earnestly sought to distract public attention from the doings of the Red Army by your wholehearted support of various charges against the Germans and Japanese which have been and will be put into circulation by the Ministry.
Your expression of belief in such may convince others.
I am, sir, Your obedient servant
H. Hewet, Assistant Secretary
There was even a postscript, as follows:
The Ministry can enter into no correspondence of any kind with regard to the communication which should only be disclosed to responsible persons. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy: A Pattern in Poland, John Wiley and Sons, NY. page 209-210)
This is quite an astounding document. This letter is ample evidence that during World War II, the Allies used atrocity propaganda against Hitler Germany to distract their own people from the atrocities being committed primarily but not exclusively by the Red Army - their "comrades"! - in the invasion of Europe as Hitler's war drew to an end.
Note, though, that there was nothing in this letter that talked of gassing people.
Why not? Because foolish atrocity propaganda is something else again. The gas chamber claim was floated briefly as a propaganda test kite but was quickly abandoned as too "unbelievable." If atrocity fiction is found to be so gross, outlandish and implausible that thinking, feeling people simply cannot swallow it, it is not in an army leader's interest to peddle such a "crime."
This was the case originally with the "gas chamber" claim.
In point of fact, the British Ministry of Information at first requested British clergy to help spread the "gas chamber" story which was planned to be put in circulation by the Ministry. (Rozek, Edward J., Allied Wartime Diplomacy, pp 108-110. John Wiley and Sons, New York ) However, from the start, it was judged to be too problematic and bizarre and, therefore, it was quickly withdrawn as a potential strategic embarrassment.
Some of the "lesser" so-called "crimes" that people were willing to swallow did survive and thrive for a while, both during World War I and World War II - some of them for longer periods than others.
For example, many of the older generation, both in Europe and America, still vividly remember the macabre World War I Allied propaganda claims of the German ". . . cadavers-into-soap factories," the ". . . chopped-off hands of Belgian babies," the ". . . crucified Canadian soldier" stories - all of which proved to be lies, and for some of which post WWI Allied statesmen even apologized to the Germans.
|Some even remember the incredible, hysterical claim made by the then-Governor of New York State (who was a Jew), even in 1917-18, (!) that the Germans had been ". . . exterminating millions of Jews." |
Even more telling was the claim about the ". . . six million"! (Glynn, Martin, The Crucifixion of the Jews Must Stop The American Hebrew, October 31, 1920.)
So you see - the "six million" story is old. Very old.
It had been peddled before. In a recent book entitled "Keystone of the New World Order: The Holocaust Dogma of Judaism," the author, Ben Weintraub makes the point that the number has, in fact, mythical significance because it is based on cabalistic sources. (Weintraub, Ben, The Holocaust Dogma: Keystone of the New World Order, Cosmos Publishers, 1994)
Unfortunately, it took a gullible, systematically mis-educated populace such as we have today, coupled with relentless brainwashing by a corruptible lap dog media, to peddle the lie for decades the way it has been peddled. In World War I, there was no electronic media. After WWII, this handy tale was dusted off and heaved once more against the German people.
The massive psychological onslaught really only started, however, with the fictitious television series, "Holocaust," shown worldwide to an estimated 100 million people. Next there was "Schindler's List." There were thousands of other production not nearly as vicious in impact, but cumulatively destructive.
Let us be very clear on one point: There would have been no hesitation to use the story of the "gassings" even during the war - had it been plausible. However, even during the war, the leadership of the Allied Nations - such as Churchill and Roosevelt as well as those of the Catholic hierarchy, including the then-Pope Pius XI - knew from their various intelligence agencies, spies on the ground, inmates with radio transmitters inside various camps (including inmate soldiers, inmate priests, even those who took confessions of local military, police and guard personnel) that no organized mass exterminations by gassing or any other means were going on inside these camps.
How did they know?
The Allied leaders had detailed aerial photos, none of which corroborated the hysterical claims then made by Zionist agitators like Rabbi Stephen Wise and others around the world. It simply wasn't true. There were no gassings of people going on - only of lice! The story was a cheese with many, many holes. And it was judged as problematic.
As a consequence, the Allied leadership specifically removed any reference to "gas chambers" in their wartime atrocity propaganda, even in their diplomatic dispatches, because there was no proof. (Allied Diplomacy in Wartime, Samisdat Resource Book, pp 108-110)
In August of 1943, the Allies decided officially not to make this specific allegation of "gas chambers" against the Nazis in a published declaration on the grounds of "insufficient evidence to justify the statement regarding execution in gas chambers." ( Foreign Relations of the United States Diplomatic Papers, 1943. Samisdat Resource Book)
The Allies and the Pope thus did not need to deny what did not take place - except in the feverish brains of the Zionists who were jockeying through unique "victimhood" for the creation of the State of Israel and postwar political advantage (including massive reparations payments from Germany) which needed the accusation of genocide against the Jews.
And, as we will explain in more detail, the trials at Nuremberg were based on those accusations. The Zionists needed a conviction, in order to leverage the guilt money out of a craven government created by the Allies.
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Two:
There is no proof that the Holocaust, as depicted by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby and the highly politicized Hollywood industry, actually occurred.
Revisionists don't claim that Jews didn't suffer. They don't argue the fact that Jews were, in fact, unwanted in Germany, and that there was a state policy to remove them as a "parasitic people" harmful to the country.
It is absolutely true that Jews were incarcerated and often treated cruelly. They were seen as the enemy, just as in our times the "Nazis" are seen as the enemy of entrenched oligarchies.
Revisionists do claim and argue that there was no state policy that called for the "mass extermination of the Jews" or any other unwanted minorities. The Allies, independently and singly, interrogated 26,000 functionaries of the National Socialist regime immediately after Germany's defeat, all based on the same set of questions. Some people might have thought of lying for their own benefit by implicating others.
Not one German official reported knowing of such a program. They all said that the first time they heard about it was from the Allies after the war.
This really gets down to the nitty-gritty of where the story of the mass extermination came from - which is the Rudolf Hoess "confession."
The Rudolf Hoess Confession is an incredibly "incriminating" document. All evil stems from it. Here is the background story.
Rudolf Hoess, the former wartime commandant of Auschwitz "confessed" to the most incredible things during the Nuremberg Trials in this widely used and much-quoted "document." A good overview from a human interest story point of view of how that was accomplished is given in the Zundelsite Internet editorial: "Nuremberg: The Crime that Will Not Die". It is a summary worth reading.
Many Germans, at Nuremberg and elsewhere where they were made to stand trial for "war crimes" have "confessed" to brutalities under "duress" or inducements. Documents, testimony and confessions as well as affidavits presented at Nuremberg and elsewhere were frequently produced and signed after psychological and physical torture of its authors.
For proof of torture of captured Germans by the Allies, read Legions of Death, a book by Rupert Butler, an English writer, who gives a vivid description of how the wartime, one-time Concentration Camp Commandant, Rudolf Hoess, was beaten mercilessly and drugged with alcohol for several days before he signed his famous "confession" admitting to two-and-a-half million of people gassed in gas chambers in Auschwitz.
Suffice it to say here that this so-called "confession" was written in English, and that Hoess did not speak or even understand English. (2Butler, Rupert, Legions of Death, Hamlyn Paperbacks, Great Britain, 1983, pp 10-12)
Julius Streicher, to name another German official who was savagely tortured by American interrogators to extract a "confession," reported that he was beaten so badly that he lost 40% of his hearing. He was kept naked in an unheated cell and was made to drink from the latrine. Guards forced his teeth open with a stick so as to spit in his mouth. ("Streicher Opens His Case,", London Times, April 27. 1946)
This information was later expunged from the Nuremberg Trial transcripts, with the consent of the president of the Tribunal and even the "defense" lawyer.
Yet another source is the Simpson van Rhoden Commission of Enquiry into the conduct of US interrogators during the Malmedy-Dachau trials. This commission reported mistreatment and tortures, including mock trials, the administering of fake confessions by equally fake "priests," beatings, hoodings etc. to get forced confessions out of prisoners. (The Progressive, written by Judge Edward L. Van Rhoden in February of 1949 entitled American Atrocities in Germany)
Here is a sample of how such "confessions" were routinely obtained:
"American investigators at the U.S. Court in Dachau, Germany, used the following methods to obtain confessions:
Beatings and brutal kickings. Knocking out teeth and breaking jaws. Mock trials. Solitary confinement. Posturing as priests. Very limited rations. Spiritual deprivation. Promises of acquittal (ed. expl: if the victim implicated fellow prisoners to corroborate the Allied trial scenarios) . . . All but two of the Germans, in the 139 cases we investigated, had been kicked in the testicles beyond repair." (Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 44-45)
U.S. Chief Justice Harlan Fiske Stone, referring to the Nuremberg trials and speaking of the American Chief Prosecutor, Jackson, had this to say, as quoted in a Viking Press hard cover, "Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law:"
"Jackson is away conducting his high grade lynching party in Nuremberg," he remarked. "I don't mind what he does to the Nazis, but I hate to see the pretense that he is running a court and proceeding according to common law.
This is a little too sanctimonious a fraud to meet my old-fashioned ideas." (Mason, Thomas, Harlan Fiske Stone: Pillar of the Law, Alpheus The Viking Press, page 746)
An accusation does not make a fact. A headline does not make a fact. A tortured prisoner making a "confession" cannot make his words a fact.
Here is another good example of a "well-documented" crime:
The Germans were accused at Nuremberg of having killed 15,000 Polish officers and members of the Polish elite at Katyn. Seven German military officers and soldiers were executed by the Soviets after a trial in which more than 4,000 (!) sworn affidavits and dozens of "experts" and "witnesses" were proffered by the Stalinist prosecutors.
In 1989, Soviet leader Gorbachev admitted publicly that the Stalin regime was responsible for these mass murders of the Poles. Not the Germans. America's ally - Joseph Stalin! - had ordered the killings!
So if Judge Thomas T. Johnson of the California Superior Court, and Judge Thomas of the Toronto District Court took smug "Judicial Notice" of the Holocaust, they based it on "readily available" documentation tortured and coerced out of the victims of Allied torture masters.
What kind of "documented evidence" is that? It would not be permissible in any U.S. or Canadian Court.
In Nuremberg and in many subsequent trials against so-called "Nazi war crimes" these methods were routinely accepted and "acceptable" as a matter of policy and "the rules."
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Three:
The numbers of "Holocaust" victims are irresponsibly exaggerated
The numbers game of alleged Jewish losses is indeed a vexing one. Many, many people of all nationalities disappeared or perished in the war and cannot be accounted for. Some lie in the ashes of Allied bombings of German cities and buried beneath collapsed buildings; others were incinerated in bomb-caused Allied firestorms; still others perished in the Russian Gulags long after the shooting had stopped.
It is unfair and incorrect to claim - as is routinely claimed - that if a person cannot be accounted for, he or she perished due to genocide - or, worse yet, due to gassings.
In fact, the "Holocaust" is the best example of ". . . death proved by the stories of million of survivors."
Does that not make you think?
The media is full of "survivor" organizations existing in every major city of the Western World - from Toronto to Johannesburg; from Rio de Janeiro to Los Angeles.
Suffice it to say that the Germans have paid over 4,300,000 pension and restitution claims; 40% of those recipients live (or lived) in Israel. Others are of Jewish background but have chosen to live in other parts of the world.
If so many millions of Jewish people died at the hands of the Germans, why are there so many survivors?
Aficionados of the "Holocaust" have often called Jacob Robinson a "historian" and "internationalist jurist" and referred to him as a prime source of authoritative information on what happened to the Jews.
Jacob Robinson was, in fact, a cunning East European Jewish shyster with a diabolical plan and agenda. He was the inventor/creator of the "revolutionary concept" of the idea of the Nuremberg Trial for Germany's leaders and the German Reparations scheme.
According to Nahum Goldman, former President of the World Jewish Congress:
". . . Apart from my encounter with the survivors of the concentration camps after the liberation, I only returned officially to Germany in order to meet Chancellor Adenauer and open negotiations about reparations. These reparations constitute an extraordinary innovation in terms of international law.
Until then, when a country lost a war, it paid damages to the victor, but it was a matter between states, between governments. Now for the first time a nation was to give reparations either to ordinary individuals or to Israel, which did not legally exist at the time of Hitler's crimes. All the same, I must admit that the idea did not come from me.
During the war the WJC (World Jewish Congress) had created an Institute of Jewish Affairs in New York (its headquarters are now in London). The directors were two great Lithuanian Jewish jurists, Jacob and Nehemiah Robinson. Thanks to them, the Institute worked out two completely revolutionary ideas: the Nuremberg tribunal and German reparations. (Goldman, Nahum, The Jewish Paradox, Grosset & Dunlap, 1978, p 122)
Put two and two together.
Reparation claims are based on number of victims - somewhat like an insurance claim after a plane crash and a subsequent fire. It pays to keep these numbers high. No mystery to that.
Now visualize an insurance company that has to pay for a fire in which, supposedly, some family members perished. It does not take a rocket scientist to figure out that if the insurance company is prevented from checking vital documents, such as: ". . . who was actually booked on that plane. . . ? - a non-existent "victim" uncle or aunt could conceivably materialize, defrauding the insurance company. These things are known to have been done to some insurance companies.
To trot out the old canard of the "Protocol of Wannsee" (of Jan. 20, 1942) allegedly outlining the Nazi plans to "annihilate the European Jews" shows real chutzpah. Even the Jewish Holocaust expert Yehuda Bauer of Hebrew University in Jerusalem has said that Wannsee was a meeting, but "hardly a conference," and that ". . . little of what was said there was executed in detail."
Here is the quote in full, under the title: Wannsee's importance rejected, in the Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 30, 1992:
"The public still repeats, time after time, the silly story that at Wannsee the extermination of the Jews was arrived at. Wannsee was but a stage in the unfolding of the process of mass murder." (Canadian Jewish News, Jan. 30, 1992)
According to the New York Times, November 12, 1989, (Bauer) added when chided saying that he would not want to ". . . add grist for the mills of the deniers of the Holocaust: "They can add, you know. . ." (Auschwutz Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar's Case, NYT, Nov 12, 1989)
They did, and they do.
By doing so, they "shrunk the Holocaust." Let us take Auschwitz, for example. According to a December 10, 1995 summary prepared by Dr. Faurisson, here is a telling visual:
(In this graph, the tallest bar represents 9 million persons, and the smallest bar represents 630,000 - 710,000, of whom 470,000 - 550,000 were believed to have been Jews. (For the actual and detailed verification of both numbers and sources, go to Dr. Faurisson's textual document, marked Appendix A)
The ever-shrinking numbers of Auschwitz "victims" should give skeptical people - people who apply common sense to this topic - pause to ponder. Yehuda Bauer, Jewish Holocaust scholar, admitted the falsity of the 4 million figure in a November 1989 article, where he comments on the cruel manipulation of the numbers of victims in Auschwitz by Zionists and Communist propagandists and liars alike. (Auschwitz Revisionism: An Israeli Scholar's Case. NYT, November 12, 1989.)
Let's mention the Red Cross here as well. This so-called "humanitarian" organization has much to do with the fact that the numbers are so unreliable.
The Red Cross played an ignoble role during and especially after the war when dealing with alleged "Nazi atrocity" stories and statistics. (See sworn testimony of Charles Biederman during the Zündel Trial. Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 80-84. It is worth reading in its entirety.)
Below I am merely offering two excerpts of this testimony, as summarized in the Zündel Transcripts by Barbara Kulaszka in her book: "Did Six Million Really Die?":
"Access to the documents was limited by the Bonn Agreements of 1955 to former persecutees and their legal successors on the grounds that the documents were all person-related and therefore not open to the public. (11-2497, 2498). The wording used in the Bonn Agreement was that the archives were "only to be evaluated in the interests of the former persecutees themselves or their successors." (12-2676). The only exception to this rule, as provided for under the agreements, was that representatives of any of the ten Allied governments of the supervisory body had the right to inspect the documents. (11-2497) Any application by one of the ten governments for access was reviewed by the Director of the ITS (Internal Tracing System); if the Director felt it was not justified, he could submit the application to the International Commission for the final decision. He could not remember any request by Israel being denied. (12-2711)"
In other words, Israel can look at the data, but German researchers and historians cannot. Revisionists cannot. Ernst Zündel cannot. Mr. Wiesenthal, presumably, can.
The Kulaszka trial transcript summary goes on to say:
Biedermann confirmed that as of December 31, 1983, the total number of deaths registered with the Special Registry Office and various other registry offices was 373,468. (11-2515) This figure represented death certificates issued pursuant to received applications and was based, with respect to the Special Registry Office, on camp records kept by the Nazis during the war. (11-2516, 2517)
Biedermann agreed that at an international conference held by the International Committee of the Camps in Vienna in 1977, the then director of the ITS, Albert de Cocatrix, gave a speech which indicated that as of December 31, 1976 a total of 357,190 names of persons who died in concentration camps had been registered at the Special Registry Office. Biedermann confirmed that these numbers actually came from the ITS. (12-2640 to 2646) He pointed out, however, that these figures resulted from applications. If an entire family had died, there was no one to make an application for a death certificate. Secondly, the ITS had complete documentation for only two of the twenty-two concentration camps. For the remainder, it had either partial or no documentation. Therefore, if an application was made for a person who had allegedly died in one of these camps, the ITS would not have the records to justify a request to the Special Registry Office for a death certificate. (12-2647)
It is really ridiculously simple. The numbers game on which the reparations claims are based could be laid to rest tomorrow.
The Red Cross via its International Tracing Service in Arolson, headed by Red Cross delegate, Charles Biedermann, has important information on hand of every concentration camp inmate who ever went through a German prisoner-of-war or civilian concentration camp. These 14 million pieces of information could, with today's computer technology, OCR software etc. be sifted, categorized, analyzed and double-checked. In a very short time, this information could be made available to the public, which would put an effective end to all the abuse, misinterpretation, fudging and falsifying of alleged and real numbers of "Nazi victims."
The German Government can and should have checked the inmates' records 50 years ago. Why is this not being done? A good guess is that then it would have been revealed for all the world to see that false reparations claims were made and billions were paid and have been fraudulently collected for a long time.
There are letters by the Arolson Tracing Service which at least give a partial glimpse at what is available in those archives there. The Red Cross, by accepting the currently worded 10-nation agreement or mandate with which it administers this macabre but important legacy of WW II, has become a willing accomplice in obfuscating research and is, in fact, hiding historical facts.
I am on record saying that the Red Cross is deliberately stone-walling an honest investigation into one of the saddest chapters in human history. If the Red Cross does not like this justified criticism, let them get out of the business of hiding the truth from the public looking for answers.
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Four:
Official state policy towards the Jews in the Third Reich was emigration, not extermination.
It is true that Hitler Germany wanted to remove the Jews from the German people's "sphere of influence." The country was at war - a war largely seen as having been instigated by international banking Jewry, and Jews were seen as a corroding influence, not only financially but also racially and culturally.
A common word then used was "parasites." (Know that, in America, a National Socialist is commonly referred to as "scum bag". . . If you want to know what modern persecution and demonization of unwanted people looks like, try this cartoon.) http://www.web.apc.org/~ara/zundel_r.gif
Hitler Germany was adamant in not wanting Jews to be part of Germany because they were held to be harmful to the fabric of an ethnically cohesive society as it was woven by Hitler. The Führer wanted Jews "out of his face." He was not fond of them.
But that is where the story stops. The Talmudic twists and gyrations some of these people still go through, when "relocation" and "evacuation" of Jews suddenly become code words for "extermination", is amazing.
All of it was covered in the Zündel Trials in the minutest detail and has been laid to rest forever in the transcripts of those trials, now permanent documents in the Canadian judicial law libraries! A little basic research would have gone a long way for Nizkor.
The Himmler Posen speech, to be even more specific, was the subject of lengthy analysis in the two Toronto Zündel trials. Minute detail can be gleaned in studying the testimony of German political scientist Udo Walendy and Dr. Robert Faurisson in the 1985 trial and in the testimony of Browning, Faurisson British historian David Irving and Mark Weber in the second, 1988, trial. (Again, the reference here is the Kulaszka book, Did Six Million Really Die?)
Time and again, the Holocaust Promotion Lobby counts on the naive acute of the reader who is not likely to check on the facts and fine-tune his thinking on what was meant by "evacuation" and "relocation."
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Five:
Not a single document has been found with Hitler's signature ordering the extermination of the Jews
It is a heartening development to have the Holocaust Promotion Lobby in general finally admit that there was, in fact, no Führer order ever to exterminate the Jews. Revisionists credit themselves for having secured this admission. Alleged Extermination of the Jews
At the 1988 Zündel Trial, defense attorney Christie placed a transparency on an overhead projector, which stated:
(No expert report stating:
"This was a homicidal gas chamber")
(No autopsy stating: "This is or was the body of a person killed by poison gas.")
for this alleged mass extermination campaign!
That there existed such an order had been a much-repeated claim for decades, and many people still believe there was. Dr. Raul Hilberg - known as the "Pope of the Holocaust" for having authored "The Destruction of the European Jews," (often referred to as "The Holocaust Bible") a man who is widely regarded as the "#1 Expert" on Holocaust matters, has managed to bring his perception of the Holocaust a little more in accord with the facts, thanks to Revisionist influence, to wit:
- In his 1961 edition of his book, "The Destruction of the European Jews," Dr. Hilberg wrote that there were two Hitler orders. (Hilberg, Raul, The Destruction of the European Jews, Quadrangel, Chicago, page 177)
- At the 1985 trial of Ernst Zündel, Hilberg continued to insist that the orders existed, stating that he would not be correcting what he wrote in 1961 in his new, forthcoming edition. (Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 851-852)
- Shortly after his testimony, Hilberg then proceeded to delete all references to a Hitler Order in the body of his new edition, published in 1985. (Hilberg, Raul, "The Destruction of the European Jews," Holmes & Meyer, New York, 1985, p 402) in Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 112-113)
- In this new edition, the reference to a "Hitler Order" is buried in a footnote that now reads as follows:
"Thus came about not so much a plan being carried out, but an incredible meeting of minds, a consensus, mind-reading by a far-flung bureaucracy." (Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp 112-113)
"Did this include nods and winks?" asked Zündel defense attorney, Douglas Christie, in the 1988 Zundel Trial. Let's let the reader guess.
Did the Nazis whisper in each others ears how to exterminate millions and millions of Jews? Believable? Maybe, so is the Easter bunny!
Even Holocaust historian Christopher Browning noted this as a major interpretational change in Hilberg's work, speaking of his colleague as "the Revised Hilberg." (The Revised Hilberg, Simon Wiesenthal Annual, Volume 3, 1986)
So now it is agreed by friend and foe alike except by those who still need to catch up there was no Führer order.
What is still left are two incendiary words: "Final Solution" - or, the German equivalent, "Endlösung."
Let's look at those.
It is true that the words "Endlösung" or "Final Solution" were used in reference to the Jews. So what? Does that prove anything? Does that mean "extermination"? Does a "Final Solution" to the unemployment problem mean the government is going to exterminate all the unemployed?
During the war, the phrase was used in Canada when dealing with the Japanese - and nobody claims today that Canada was planning genocidal things with reference to Orientals!
In a recent television documentary about Canada's wartime policy toward Canadians of Japanese origin, documents were unearthed that talked about "The Final Solution" to the "Japanese problem" - which was relocation, denaturalization and deportation of the Japanese from Canada to Japan. This was exactly what Germany's policies were towards the Jews - for almost the same reasons. The country was at war, and Jews were seen as subversive to the government and to the war effort - just as Japanese were seen as subversive to Canadian wartime policies.
Germany's policies were far less race-based and much more ideological in nature than Canada's. As a matter of fact and record, tens of thousands of Jews lived and worked in Germany during the war outside concentration camps, even in Hitler's capital, Berlin - one of them being the famous Rabbi and Zionist leader Leo Boeck, who was a practicing rabbi in 1943!
If you doubt that, check on the 1943 Berlin telephone book!
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Six:
"Zyklon B was a fumigant. It wasn't a practical agent for mass murder."
A big deal is made by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby about all the many invoices they have found for a delousing compound. So what? Lice, which carried deadly diseases like typhus, were a horrific sanitation problem during WW II for friend and enemy alike. As a matter of fact, refugees and soldiers alike were routinely and periodically deloused. (And, by the way, their hair was shorn as well to make delousing easier).
The German Army, the SS, German civilian companies, hospitals, factories, ships, what have you - all used this Zyklon B compound during the war to get rid of vermin. All of them were issued invoices. The German Wehrmacht had stacks and stacks of them. Does that mean the German Army killed all of its own soldiers? Nonsense!
Zyklon B was a very effective means for killing vermin used for many armies, including the US Army, well into the 1970s. Even more to the point, and even more telling, is the fact that there are lots of invoices for Zyklon B for concentration camps like Oranienburg and Theresienstadt,
where no one claims people were gassed.
All these "incriminating" invoices, whether for the Army or the civilian concentration camps, prove only one thing: The Germans wanted to save lives - even their enemies' lives - by killing lice and other vermin.
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Seven:
Zyklon B was highly toxic. This being so, it would have been foolish and counterproductive to endanger Third Reich personnel engaged in allegedly pulling bodies from the execution chambers shortly after they were "gassed
The fraudulent story of the powerful ventilators installed in the alleged gas chambers, which in reality were morgues, has often been repeated. Anyone with common sense can visit Auschwitz-Birkenau and look at the close proximity of the alleged "gas chamber" to the SS-cafeteria and hospital a few meters across the street. They will see no powerful exhausts, no screws or nuts, no mounts or anchors for them, no tall stacks similar to those that exist, for instance, in the death house gas chamber complex in Parchmont, Mississippi and other U.S. gas chambers - devices to expel and dispel the deadly gas.
Furthermore, there are reports - for example, the Hoess "confession" obtained through bestial torture! - by all kinds of Holocaust Promotion Lobbyists that the "Sonderkommandos" entered the alleged gas chambers to remove the dead after only minutes of the "gassings" - smoking, eating, and drinking! They hardly did that through gas masks.
Go to Auschwitz. Go to Birkenau. Look at the crematory ovens allegedly in operation for 24 hours around the clock, right in the next room to the "gas chamber." Between the two rooms was not even a door! No provisions for a door are evident.
We have forensic proof, independently verifiable, via the samples and scrapings taken from these facilities by the much maligned Fred Leuchter and the German scientist Germar Rudolf, showing no residue or very little residue of the Zyklon B that, according to the late Dr. William Lindsey, top ranking research chemist for the giant U.S. chemical company, Du Pont of America, would still have to be there attached to the iron in sand, concrete etc. for hundreds if not thousands of years. (Lindsey, William B. "Zyclon B., Auschwitz and the Trial of Dr. Bruno Tesch," Journal of Historical Review,4, (1983: 261-303.)
The samples taken by the Leuchter procedure wearing rubber gloves and face masks and dating, identifying and double-bagging these samples in sterile plastic bags were filmed as a precaution before they were taken to the USA and analyzed by Alpha Laboratories of Ashland, MA, by Dr. James Roth, a ten-year veteran professor of Chemistry at Cornell University. Dr. Roth was accredited as an expert in his field by the Toronto Court during the 1988 Zündel trial. (Roth Testimony as summarized in Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp. 362-363)
Check up on Dr. Roth's testimony and then forever hold your peace.
Holocaust Revisionist Claim Eight:
American execution expert, Fred Leuchter, delivered a scientific break-through in proving that the so-called gas chambers at Auschwitz could not have been used for their alleged purpose
After the Leuchter Report, Fred Leuchter has been viciously attacked for two reasons: 1) He did not have an engineering degree when he wrote his trail-blazing studies, and 2) he was paid by the Zündel Defense and, hence, considered beholden to the Revisionist point of view.
The proof is in the pudding.
It is true that Leuchter did not have what the establishment considers an appropriate degree. Jesus Christ didn't have a degree in Christianity. Marx did not have a degree in Marxism.
What Leuchter found can be, and has been, independently verified by engineers who have impeccable degrees.
Fred Leuchter was, prior to having his career and reputation ruined by the Holocaust Promotion Lobby, a most sought-after specialist in execution type equipment in America, as per Warden Bill Armontrout, who recommended him.
Warden Armontrout testified in the 1988 Zündel Trial that there was only one consultant in the United States that he knew of in the design, operation and maintenance of gas chambers, and that consultant was Fred Leuchter.
It was Armontrout who urged Zündel to contact Leuchter. (Armontrout Testimony: As summarized in Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp. 351-353)
Leuchter was a highly competent, well-paid and respected man in his field - until he was ruined financially and in his reputation by the vicious attacks of the Holocaust Promotion Lobby that saw its lucrative racket, netting billions of dollars for years, challenged by the Leuchter findings. Furthermore, Leuchter was qualified by Judge Thomas as an expert witness during the Zündel trial. Any serious researcher could have verified that by checking the Zündel Trial 1988 transcripts pertaining to Leuchter's testimony. (Leuchter Testimony as summarized in Did Six Million Really Die? Report of the Evidence in the Canadian "False News" Trial of Ernst Zündel - 1988, Edited by Barbara Kulaszka, pp. 354-362)
The second charge is that Leuchter was paid by the Zündel defense - and, hence, his finding are automatically labeled to be "suspect."
Of course Fred Leuchter was paid by the Zündel defense. He was hired to go to Auschwitz in a highly dramatic, secret mission while Ernst Zündel was on trial in Toronto in 1988, fighting for his freedom and reputation. There was no time or money to scout around for someone else. He was not a "fly-by-night" specialist, as has been repeatedly claimed.
Furthermore, Leuchter stated at the outset to Zündel and his lawyer, before he ever went to Auschwitz, that he believed the Auschwitz gas chamber claim, and if he found it verified, then he would state so under oath and in his report.
Zündel still engaged and sent him because he was sure of his facts and counted on Leuchter's professional integrity.
Leuchter went. He saw. He came back a much-enlightened man.
Read what he had to say. (Leuchter, Fred A. The Leuchter Report: The How and the Why. Journal of Historical Review 9, (1989): 133-139.) Also at these links: http://www.ihr.org/books/leuchter/leuchter.toc.html and http://www.codoh.com/gcgv/gc426v12.html
So Leuchter was paid for his work. So what? Who paid for the Pressac investigation and book? Who paid for the Beate Klarsfeld Foundation? Who paid for the study of the Zündel case condensed in a book called "Hate on Trial"? (Gabriel Weimann and Conrad Winn, Hate on Trial, Mosaic Press, Oakville, 1986)
(No, not who you think! At least in part, the Canadian taxpayers did!)
Dr. Hilberg and Dr. Browning were paid by the Government of Canada for their expertise to bolster the Holocaust Promotion Lobby claim. Browning alone got almost $25,000 for testifying against Ernst Zündel - courtesy of the Canadian tax payers.
Do these two facts, that Leuchter was paid, and that Leuchter did not have the necessary rubber stamps to do the work he did negate scientific findings that can be double-checked and verified? When Leuchter was asked what stood in the way of someone being paid to malign his (Leuchter's) scientific findings, Leuchter stated simply:
"Anyone who would do that would risk his professional standing."
Will there be highly reputable professionals in the engineering field willing to come forward and replicate what Leuchter did? We will just have to see.
Revisionist reality is grim. Right now in Germany, if a scientist verifies the Leuchter findings, that scientist loses his job and goes to prison. Another case is the Lüftl Report. Walter Lüftl is an Austrian engineer. He was for years president of the Austrian Chamber of Engineers, the representative body of all Austrian engineers. He was a court-approved expert frequently called to testify in engineering matters. He investigated Auschwitz and came to similar conclusions to Leuchter's. The Austrians promptly charged him criminally for stating his best engineering viewpoint - that the Auschwitz "gassing" facilities were fakes. This caused him lots of grief. As a consequence, he resigned his position. The media had a feeding frenzy. After several years, the case was quietly dropped by the state. Even worse fared young Germar Rudolf, a German scientist of the finest qualifications, with not a speck on his credentials and his record. He wrote a magnificent report. (Das Rudolf Gutachten, Cromwell Press, 1993.) His life and career are ruined, while Browning's fortune soared.
For this reason alone, you don't see many people volunteering to tramp to Auschwitz with their own engineering gear.
We can hear you now, but where did the six million number come from?
Ever hear the word -- Propaganda?
Instances of the use of the 6 million figure:
New York Times, May 7, 1920: “Jewish war sufferers in Central and Eastern Europe, where six millions face horrifying conditions of famine, disease and death.”
New York Times, May 5, 1920, p. 9: “…To save six million men and women in Eastern Europe from extermination by hunger and disease.”
New York Times, May 5, 1920, p. 19: “Six million starving, fever-stricken sufferers in war-torn Europe appeal to us.”
New York Times, May 3, 1920, p. 11: “Your help is needed to save the lives of six million people in Eastern and Central Europe.”
New York Times, May 2, 1920, p. 1: “…Six million human beings, without food, shelter, clothing or medical treatment.”
New York Times, May 1, 1920, p. 8: “But the lives of 6,000,000 human beings are waiting for an answer.”
New York Times, Dec. 3, 1919, p. 19: “nothing on earth except a miracle can prevent the death by freezing and starvation of from 5,000,000 to 10,000,000 people in Europe and the Middle East this winter. …atrocious Jewish massacre.”
New York Times, Nov. 12, 1919, p. 7: “…tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population of the earth. …a million children and five million parents and elders.
The American Hebrew [above], Oct. 31, 1919, pp. 582-.: “From across the sea, six million men and women call to us for help. …six million human beings… Six million men and women are dying. …in the threatened holocaust of human life. …six million famished men and women. Six million men and women are dying…”
New York Times, Sept. 29, 1919, p. 7: “tragically unbelievable poverty, starvation and disease… about 6,000,000 souls, or half the Jewish population of the earth.”
New York Times, Aug. 10, 1917: “Germans Let Jews Die. Women and Children in Warsaw Starving to Death… Jewish mothers, mothers of mercy, feel happy to see their nursing babies die; at least they are through with their suffering.”
New York Times, Jan. 14, 1915, p. 3: “In the world today there are about 13,000,000 Jews, of whom more than 6,000,000 are in the heart of the war zone; Jews whose lives are at stake and who today are subjected to every manner of suffering and sorrow […].”
But let us go one step further back in time. In 1900, Rabbi Stephen Wise made the following statement before Jewish welfare organizations in the USA: “there are 6,000,000 living, bleeding, suffering arguments in favor of Zionism.”
Aren't you at least a little bit suspicious
The Jews picked this number almost 40 years before Hitler entered Poland
No one denies the concentration camps. They were detention centers, in numbers not nearly as high as is claimed. They were not killing centers.
In fact, according to the Time Life book series on prisoners, German concentration camps numbered less than one-sixth the number of camps the USA had for the Japanese, Germans, Italians and P.O.Ws, and considerably fewer camps than the Allies' vicious ally, Stalin, had in his Gulag.
These camps like Auschwitz harbored Jews, among many other nationalities. They also harbored criminals, including German criminals. They harbored traitors, spies and others who were sabotaging Germany at war.
Once more: They were detention centers. They were NOT killing centers.
Nobody survived Stalin's killer squads in Katyn, and very few if any survived the icy tomb of Kolyma and many other Stalin camps. It bears repeating that in the infamous "Holocaust" we have the only case of "genocide" that is daily "proven" by survivors.
It is sadly true that tens of thousands of all kinds of nationalities died in different German camps, largely of diseases caused by malnutrition, overcrowding, lack of hygiene and lack of medicines. Undoubtedly some died of neglect and even cruel treatment by brutal guards. Human nature being what it is and was, there must have been atrocities. No one denies there have been individual atrocities. Who can surmise how a guard might have felt and acted who was just told that his own baby was incinerated in the true Holocaust that was called Dresden - a defenseless, strategically unimportant city filled with refugees? What if he just found out that his own mother lay buried in the ruins of Hamburg or Berlin? He will not have felt kindly toward those whom he considered enemies. Under the circumstances, Jews may have been high on that list.
These experiences were not unique to the "Nazi camps."
They were shared by tens of millions in Stalin's Gulags in political and in prisoners-of-war camps. This fate was shared by the Dutch at the hands of the Japanese, and by the British and Canadians in Burma, Singapore and Hong Kong. It was shared by the Americans in the Philippines, and by the Germans in Poland, Czechoslovakia, Yugoslavia and France.
And let us not forget that it was shared by Germans in Germany after the war in the American Army's Rheinwiesen death camps described by Canadian author James Bacque in his book "Other Losses" and in his recently released new book, "Of Crimes and Mercies" on the topic. Bacque claims that nine million Germans died as a direct result of a deliberate Allied policy.
All of these deaths were tragic deaths. They were tragic for Jews, and they were tragic for Germans. They were tragic for all involved in that war. To quote Dr. Robert Faurisson, eminent Revisionist: "You keep talking about war crimes. War itself is the crime."
To claim there were atrocities and then equating them to genocide is viciously deceptive. The statistical and logistical riddle about where which Jews went to what camps, and why, and when, was documented a long time ago by a highly detailed book by Walter Sanning called "The Dissolution of European Jewry." ( Sanning: "The Dissolution of European Jewry.")
In the latest twists and turns of the Holocaust Promotion Lobby's dance around the Great Holocaust Myth they will have you believe that the death camps were mostly in the "East," (where most of the Jews were said to have lived) and that few died in the "Old German Reich" - because it would have been easier to keep a secret in the East.
Wow! What a flash!
The fact is that tens of thousands of people were shipped via trains from Auschwitz in Poland to other camps in the Altreich (Germany Proper) at the end of the war - Elie Wiesel, Sabina Citron and Anne Frank among them.
This was done at German expense and German inconvenience. It was hardly done to kill them. They could have been easily left behind to starve to death in the abandoned concentration camps as people were scrambling to get away from Communism.
There were no German "death camps." Period. People died in every wartime concentration camp for any number of sad reasons, including old age.
One final point needs to be made, and it has to do with the world-famous Auschwitz Plaque.
For decades, it was claimed on this plaque that four million people were genocidally put to death at Auschwitz. As summarized by Dr. Faurisson, until April 3, 1990, this "commemorative" Plaque - where the Pope and presidents of many nations were taken so they could genuflect to non-existent victims, had the following inscription in 19 languages:
"Four million people suffered and died here at the hands of the Nazi murderers between the years 1940 and 1945".
For almost half a century, approximately 500,000 gullible tourists have been deliberately deceived by intellectual con-men and immoral crooks while visiting the theme park of anti-German lies and horrors at Auschwitz and Birkenau - where tour guides, books and films insisted for decades that everything the visitor saw was ". . . in its original state."
The new text reads as follows:
"May this place where the Nazis assassinated 1,500,000 men, women and children, a majority of them Jews from diverse European countries, be forever for mankind a cry of despair and of warning." (Luc Rosenzweig, "Auschwitz, la Pologne et legénocide" (Tr.'s Note: Auschwitz, Poland and the genocide), Le Monde, January 27, 1995, p. 1).)
Why the lowered numbers?
Now the Holocaust Promotion Lobby says, "Well, gee, that wasn't us. The Soviets dreamed them up."
According to this line of argument, the wicked Soviets
". . . purposely overstated the number of non-Jewish casualties at Auschwitz-Birkenau by many times their true numbers. With the end of communism in Poland and the former Soviet Union, officials at the Auschwitz museum have meticulously lowered the casualty figures in line with the estimates of historians who, for years, have insisted that between one and 1 1/2 million people perished at Auschwitz-Birkenau - 80 - 90% of them Jews. (The Breitbard Document, as published by the Simon Wiesenthal Center )
Sure, blame the Russians and the Poles. Don't give the Revisionists credit that the numbers are shrinking and ever more shrinking under the magnifying glass of scholarly scrutiny.
Why not take yet another look at Dr. Faurisson's revealing chart?
|This chart explains in an easier-to-understand way.|
Even estimates of the number of people who died at Auschwitz -- allegedly the main extermination center -- are no longer clear cut. At the postwar Nuremberg Tribunal, the Allies charged that the Germans exterminated four million people at Auschwitz. Until 1990, a memorial plaque at Auschwitz read: "Four Million People Suffered and Died Here at the Hands of the Nazi Murderers Between the Years 1940 and 1945." During a 1979 visit to the camp, Pope John Paul II stood before this memorial and blessed the four million victims.[Auschwitz - The Story Keeps Changing: See all the Stats]
Dr. Faurisson, as is his style, being the careful scholar and meticulous researcher that he is, a man who is scrupulously honest with friend and foe alike, will tell you what is known so far.
The chart above was compiled in December 1995 in response to an ad placed by the Jewish Anti-Defamation League in the New York Times. This ad asked: What happened to the missing Jews?
That is precisely what Revisionists ask - a question for which they have been hounded, beaten, spat at, vilified, charged, tried and jailed and even killed. Why is it "criminal" to want to know why the numbers are shrinking and shrinking - like a balloon that has been pricked?
Is it not good news, rather than bad news, that millions didn't die at Auschwitz? Is that not reason to rejoice?
Will we ever really know what happened and how many victims there were? Not if we cannot ask questions!
After an intensive write-in campaign initiated by the Zündel Team and directed to Mr. Gorbachev a few years ago, the Soviets finally released the remaining Death Books of Auschwitz, which they had captured in 1945.
Surprise! Guess what?
The so-called "four million", revised to "1.5 million," have shrunk to 74,000 proven deaths!
All meticulously recorded - name, date, nationality, religion, time, reason and cause of death!
German researcher Tjudar Rudolf, who is fluent in German, English, French, Yiddish and Polish and understands most slavic names and languages, has painstakingly gone over all these Soviet/Auschwitz death register books and totaled the number of Jewish deaths according to name and religion - even allowing for slavicized names.
The end result?
Slightly over 30,000 Jewish dead in Auschwitz.
That is what "Holocaust" Revisionism has achieved!
From all we know as of today, according to this man's educated analysis, some 30,000 Jews thus lost their lives, mainly to diseases and overcrowding, in Auschwitz and surrounding work camps affiliated with the main Auschwitz complex.
That is a tragic enough number of people. Why the need to exaggerate? To justify what? A vicious hate campaign for half a century against a former enemy? A regime which entered the pages of history some 50 years ago?
Is that what this is all about?
Or is it not rather to keep the Germans in perpetual mental, political, economic and financial bondage and to make them susceptible to ever new, thinly disguised blackmail schemes which have extorted over 100 Billion DM out of them for the Holocaust Lobbyists and the members of their tribe, institutions and organizations - not to forget the State of Israel? Which did not even exist at the time of the alleged crimes that were supposed to have been committed by the Nazis?
The ethnic abuse of Germans and Germany must stop. The Holocaust is not, and never has been, about this touted "Jewish victimhood." It is about extortion. Power politics. And money and revenge and hate!
The German people, most of whom were not even born when the tragedy of the Second World War befell their country, have been paying huge, huge sums of reparations to the Jewish state and people - many of them beneficiaries who themselves were equally not yet born when what the world now has been taught to call "The Holocaust" took place.
These German people have a right to all the facts. The Holocaust Promotion Lobby is brazenly misrepresenting their "facts" to fit its agenda of intolerance toward all those who would question its unconscionable, underhanded methods and goals, employing secret agents, slush funds, boycotts, threats and Holocaust terrorism.
Victimizing ever new generations of Germans for the misdeeds, real and imagined, of their grandfathers and soon great-grandfathers is no way to bring peace, tolerance and harmony to the world.
Ernst Zündel is on record saying that the persecuted of yesterday have become the persecutors of today.
Our page on German concentration camps provides more insight on each individual camp and the Jewish propaganda and myths surrounding them.
Click here to go to that page
For more information see: