INTER-RACIAL MARRIAGE Social Issues Children Besides society as a whole, who suffers the most as the result of inter-racial marriage? The children born to such unions Is the child White? NO Is the child black? NO Is the child Asian? NO What is the child? Mixed race! No true Heritage A biracial child does not fit neatly into a category And the child knows it Why are parents asking innocent children to shoulder the burden of their selfish desires? Talk about identity crisis! These two videos honestly look at the turmoil mixed-race people experience Why are two selfish people asking their families to accept this unnatural union? Talk about living for yourself Who will this half-cast child go to for help in understanding who he is White grandma? Black grandpa? Asian uncle? Hispanic aunt? Who can help? Which parent does the half-n-half child identify the most with White mom Black dad How selfish to ask the child to choose How selfish to put the child in that kind of conflict Then there is the racism within the black community towards each otherT Hey, Johnnie is lighter than Fred Give him the better job It happens all the time! | Another problem the child faces is being caught between the White and Black society. The biracial child will have a higher status in the Black community because their skin color is usually lighter. The lighter biracial child will gain advantages over the darker skinned children, but the lighter skinned child will be shunned from the Black community by the Blacks and the White community will not fully accept the child because he/she is still of Black skin. These disadvantages will cause the child to be caught in the middle of the two communities with no support.
Ernest Porterfield, Children of Black-White Marriages, Black and White Mixed Marriages (1978).
|
Cher's song, "Half-breed" says it all http://www.kewego.com/video/iLyROoafY1qs.html Consider this article that's already
ten years old: | Just under three-quarters of the present American population (73.1 percent) is classified as "non-Hispanic white" by the United States Census Bureau. But within 50 years, it predicts, White America will be barely half the population (52.8 percent.) The U.S. Census Bureau is almost certainly wrong. The man who has it right is Tiger Woods...who...outraged practically everybody by announcing on the Oprah Winfrey show that he does not see himself as black, but a "CABLINASIAN"...a word that describes what may be the largest American "race" by 2050: A mixed-race group in various shades of light brown that combines the genetic heritage of most major groups on the planet. Canada promises to be an even more comprehensive mixture, and Australia and even Britain are moving in the same direction. Woods made up the word "Cablinasian" because he had no word to describe himself. His father had one white, one native Indian and two black grandparents, and his mother was half Chinese, half Thai. "Growing up, I came up with this name -- I'm a Cablinasian," Woods explained -- a mix of Caucasian, black, Indian, and Asian. In America, the racial walls are breaking down. Only four percent of U.S. marriages are inter-racial, but that bald figure conceals a huge generational shift. In the '40s and '50s, less than two percent of black men married white women. In the past decade, the figure has soared to nearly 10 percent. And other non-white Americans, who do not suffer the special prejudice that weighs on African-American descendants of former slaves, are now "marrying out" at a staggering rate. Some 60 percent of Asian-born Americans in their 20s marry somebody of another race, and nearly 70 percent of native American Indians under the age of 25 are doing the same. "In recent years the proportion of both men and women from all racial groups who 'marry out' has increased," concluded University of Michigan demographer Reynolds Farley in a study published last month. From the Winnipeg Free Press, 6 May 1997, sec. A, p. 1, by Gwynne Dyer, "Tiger Woods' description of himself says it all. The future is light brown." |
Who do you think these racial groups are "marrying out" with? The White race! Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who put darkness for light and light for darkness, who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter!
Isaiah 5:20
But let's say you don't believe in God or the Bible Let's say you don't care about preserving your Heritage You better care about preserving your way of life! | 
Detroit |  Detroit | | 
Bronx, NY |  Bronx, NY | | 
Los Angeles |  Los Angeles |
What the White man has built The dark man has destroyed In less than 50 years the White man who built this country will no longer have dominion What will this country look like then? How will this country stay strong? We won't! Welfare Who will pay when the White man is no longer the majority race? Here are some shocking statistics on welfare recipients: These are from 1993 -- imagine how much worse it is now In the summer of 1993, the Nation had 36 million mothers 15 to 44 years old; ten percent were receiving AID to families with dependent children. Another small percentage of women over 45 and father also received AFDC. 25% of Black mothers are on welfare 20% of Hispanic mothers are on welfare 7 % of White mothers are on welfare We're in trouble as a nation This is taken directly from the US Census Bureau website The chances of receiving AFDC payments differ by race and Hispanic origin, but not the nativity of the mother.- Race: About 1 in 4 Black mothers of childbearing ages (1.5 million) were AFDC recipients, higher than the 7 percent of corresponding White mothers (2.1 million). Despite these differences in recipiency rates, Black AFDC mothers did not have significantly more children than their White counterparts.
- Hispanic origin: Nearly 1 in 5 Hispanic mothers (784,000) aged 15 to 44 were on AFDC. By comparison, about 1 in 10 (3.0 million) non-Hispanic mothers were AFDC recipients. Although both Hispanic and non-Hispanic mothers on AFDC were an average of 20 years old when they had their first child, Hispanic women had almost 0.7 more children than non-Hispanic women. About 3 in 10 Hispanic mothers on AFDC were born outside the United States.
- Nativity: About 9 percent (392,000) of the Nation's 4.2 million foreign-born mothers aged 15-44 were on AFDC, not statistically different from the 11 percent (3.4 million) of U.S.-born mothers who were AFDC recipients. Native- and foreign-born mothers on AFDC each had higher fertility rates than their counterparts who were not AFDC participants. Incidentally, about three-quarters of all foreign-born mothers on AFDC were not citizens of the United States.
Nearly one-half of AFDC mothers have never been married.- About 1.8 million of the Nation's 3.8 million mothers (48 percent) receiving AFDC payments had never been married. These never-married AFDC mothers had an average of 2.4 children each.
- Another 30 percent of AFDC mothers were currently married. (See chart on the first page.) They had an average of 2.8 children each. Most of these women (58 percent, or 648,000) either were separated or had absent husbands. However, about half a million women in intact marriages needed AFDC payments to help make ends meet.
- The remaining 23 percent of mothers receiving AFDC payments were either widowed or divorced.
Almost half of AFDC mothers do not have a high school diploma.- An additional 38 percent had completed high school (but did not attend college) and another 19 percent had attended college for at least 1 year.
- About 1 in 7 AFDC mothers were currently enrolled in school; these women, on average, had 2.1 children each and were 28 years old. Only 11 percent of these students were teenagers; this suggests that a large proportion of mothers on AFDC who are enrolled in school are trying to resume their education while raising a family under severe economic circumstances.
Most AFDC mothers are jobless ....- Unlike mothers not getting AFDC payments, most AFDC mothers (87 percent) didn't have a job. On average, jobless AFDC mothers supported 2.6 children each, no more than AFDC mothers who had a job for all or part of the month preceding the survey.
.... and have very low family incomes.- Nearly three-quarters of mothers on AFDC lived in families with monthly incomes of less than $1,000; these low-income mothers supported an average of 2.7 children each. In contrast, only 10 percent of non-AFDC mothers lived in families with such low incomes; these low-income non-AFDC mothers had an average of 2.2 children each. About 4 in every 5 AFDC mothers were below the poverty level.
Most AFDC mothers reside in central cities ....- AFDC mothers were more likely than non-AFDC mothers to live in metro areas (81 percent versus 77 percent). About 70 percent of metropolitan AFDC mothers lived in central cities. In contrast, nearly 2 in 3 metropolitan non-AFDC mothers lived in the suburbs.
.... and 1 in 5 live in a Pacific Coast State.- The Pacific Division is comprised of five States: Washington, Oregon, California, Alaska, and Hawaii. It was home to 787,000 - or 21 percent - of the Nation's AFDC mothers. Most (625,000) lived in California. Though about one-quarter of Pacific Division AFDC mothers were born outside the United States, they had an average of only 2.6 children, not significantly different from that of AFDC mothers nationally.
http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/statbriefs/sb2-95.html |
Facts are not Hate Truth is not Racist Wake up America! for more information: http://www.stormfront.org/truth_at_last/archives/interracial.htm http://academic.udayton.edu/race/04needs/s98alouis.htm |
