WHITE to BLACK 
What happens when Blacks take over what were historically White governments? What happens when Blacks take over farms in South Africa and Zimbabwe? Do you know the history of Haiti? Truth is not Racist Facts are not Hate Some people can't handle the truth South Africa The following comes from Jan and the website African Crisis: There is a lie. It is a huge lie. This lie is written in books and repeated on the airwaves and hundreds of millions of people across the world believe in this lie. The lie is this: That White people in Africa took the best land for themselves and gave the worst land to the blacks.
This lie is demonstrably false. For example, building a farm from scratch and carving it out of the wild bush, is far more difficult than taking over a working farm and running it. All the profitable farms that blacks took or stole from whites were going concerns which were created from nothing. So ask yourself: Who had the hardest work, the whites or the blacks? As you will see in the photos, even when the blacks, with Government and specialist aid and finance took over farms, the farms collapsed. So here is the other point: Even when the blacks do get the white farms (which supposedly are based on the "best land" - which is a lie), those farms still fail! 
Letsitele, was a massive Orange farm | 
This farm produced 140,000 oranges worth R7 million per annum at the time it was handed over to the blacks | 
Now the trees are dead and the Blacks are chopping them up for firewood |
The lie about the "best land" also hides other facts. Whites looked after their land and built the land up and increased its fertility, whereas the blacks ruined theirs through bad farming methods.
There is much more I can say about this lie, and I will make a point of revisiting this point of the Blacks getting the worst land and the Whites getting the best land because in South Africa itself, there is no bigger lie than this. With even the barest bit of investigation, anyone, even outside Africa, will be able to prove to themselves, via independent sources, that this is a complete lie of the highest order. All it requires is a little bit of knowledge about South Africa's geography and history, and you will see that this is the biggest, boldest and most blatant lie ever told about South Africa. And yet, it is probably the easiest one to refute. I will revisit that topic with a special series of photos I took.
Let us now look at things from another angle. Let us look at Whites who went to arid and semi-arid areas and farmed in a place where Blacks would never even think of farming, and then made a success out of it. These areas are so arid that hardly any blacks even live there.
I'm going to take you to a small place that very few people outside South Africa even know the existence of, and even in South Africa, this place is deliberately ignored and all its successes are deliberately kept out of the Mass Media. Why? Because in a country where agriculture is failing and collapsing as the Govt seizes white farms, there is a small area, where Whites operate all by themselves, and are making a great success of things.
That place is the small town of Orania. Orania was started by a few hundred Afrikaners as a type of "Afrikaner Homeland". The plan was to have a place where only Whites live, and where Whites do all the work by themselves. They have no Black labor at all. These Whites have a small town and they farm. In 2006 they even opened their own bank and issued their own currency! It is not politically correct to point out that a handful of Whites, operating by themselves, with no foreign aid; with no Government funding and with no other external assistance; are actually making a success on a continent where Blacks, despite hundreds of billions in Aid, are failing in more fertile farmland with better rain! It is not the sort of thing that the Mass Media and the Governments want to spread around too much. So that is why you never hear about Orania, and why Orania, even in South Africa, is hardly ever mentioned.
Now most of South Africa, unlike Zimbabwe is actually semi-arid. In Zimbabwe you have lots of rain and warm weather. And most of Africa to the north is even more fertile than Zimbabwe. Africa is actually a Garden of Eden and a farmer's paradise. In Colonial times Africa exported incredible varieties of foods and fruit. But in recent decades Africa is synonymous with starvation. South Africa is actually once of the worst places in Africa to farm. The temperatures are quite extreme, and the place is mostly semi-arid. South Africa is short of water at the best of times.
These Afrikaners who started Orania actually moved to an even more arid place and set themselves up by a river. And I want to show you what they did by themselves, unlike the Blacks who get IMF and World Bank funding and free money from Europe and America. These Whites financed themselves, and they did all this work by the sweat of their brow with no assistance whatsoever. 
You can see how arid it is | 
Typical house Notice the solar panel on the side | 
Took a lot of work to make this place! |
What happens to crime when Blacks take over in South Africa? The truth is gut wrenching The truth is sickening The truth is hidden by the media The truth is that now South Africa is the rape capital of the world http://censorbugbear-reports.blogspot.com/2009/01/south-african-crime-victims-terrified.html South Africa has a "culture of rape" At least 25% of South Africa's young women can expect to be raped before they reach adulthood At least 380,000 women are raped every year -- the reported rapes Gang rape is part of the "youth culture" in the black townships it's called Jackrolling AIDS infects over 6.3 million South Africans The year before apartheid ended 5,100 murders The year after 43,000 Think those South Africans would vote differently if they had it to do all over again? ************************** Zimbabwe Zimbabwe, once considered the breadbasket of Africa, exported food to other African countries Now the people starve Known as Rhodesia before 1979 when they declared independence from Great Britain and renamed themselves Zimbabwe. In 1987 Robert Mugabe became the country's first, and only, ruler (he served as Prime Minister previously). By all accounts he's ruled by terror, murder and greed. Land issues became the main issue in 1999. Despite majority rule and the existence of a "willing-buyer-willing-seller" land reform program since the 1980s, Mugabe's government claimed that whites made up less than 1% of the population but held 70% of the country's commercially viable arable land (though these figures are disputed by many outside the Government of Zimbabwe). Mugabe began to seize land from the White farmers and redistribute it to blacks in 2000 with a compulsory land redistribution. Charges that the program as a whole is designed to reward loyal Mugabe deputies have persisted in Zimbabwe since the beginning of the process. Charges that are accurate if you just ask the farmers whose land was stolen.
From Jan at African Crisis: Today in Zimbabwe the blacks are starving to death. The White farmers have been run off their land and hunger is common. The blacks took the land but cannot grow anything on it. Each year, the harvest is poorer than the year before.
Now I want to show you a photo from our photo album. Take a look at this below. This photo was taken in the late 1970's. This was taken on our farm in Ruwa, about 20Km outside what is now Harare. Do you see that woman standing in that maize? That is my mom. And that maize there, was merely some maize (corn) that my Mom planted in her garden. My mom is not a small woman either. My mom was pretty tall and yet the maize is about twice her height. I'd say the maize must be 11-12 feet high. Look at the size of the mealie (corn) cob in her hand. As I say, this was a small part of mom's garden. To the right of the photo if you look carefully, are lemon trees. Those big leaves on the ground in front of her are from her pumpkins. In South Africa, which is semi-arid, maize grows to only about half the height you see in this photo. Anyway, that was my mom's garden on our farm... probably almost exactly 30 years ago... You can't believe in 2008, in that lush country, the blacks are without food and can barely grow any food!!! 
This corn was in the garden. Can you imagine what the farms produced? |
In Zimbabwe, where the Blacks now have all the land, and still their harvests become smaller and smaller with each passing year, we now see a handful of Whites still farming - in their back yards! That is if they stay at all. Hundreds have left, some to Angola, Zambia and Mozambique which is encouraging white farmers from Zimbabwe to emigrate and settle in an attempt to revive their shattered agricultural sectors. Other Zimbabwean farmers have gone to South Africa, Great Britain, the United States, and Canada. News from Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe: a descent into hellDecember 6, 2008, Scotland Sunday Herald As Robert Mugabe's Zimbabwe government swallowed its pride and asked for international help to contain a cholera epidemic it had insisted a few days earlier was under control, body bags were among the items it requested. Zimbabweans are dying in their hundreds from a disease which, in the 21st century, should not be a mass killer. Some are dying as they reach Zimbabwe's major hospitals, only to find them closed because they have no drugs, running water or working equipment. It is in these institutions that the United Nations and the World Health Organisation (WHO) count the dead, arriving at an official death toll of 575. But the real number of dead is many times greater. The UN and WHO are unable to count those who die in their own homes in the urban townships or in the huts and fields of the rural areas. WHO says that the normal fatality rate in a modern cholera outbreak, where clean water and medication are available, is below 1%. But the death rate among infected Zimbabweans is at least 4.5% and as high as 30% in remote areas, WHO said. The disaster is so massive that Mugabe, who declared a state of emergency, has also asked for international food aid. His citizens are starving as a result of the collapse of agriculture following the expulsion of commercial farmers from 2000 onwards. Habitually, Mugabe has previously denied any need for outside help, once saying: "We are not hungry. Why foist this food on us? We don't want to be choked. We have enough."
Porta Farm Settlement
Top picture shows how it used to be Bottom picture shows it after Mugabe bulldozed all the buildings in "Operation Drive Out Rubbish" It held his own people! |
But South Africa's African National Congress government, widely criticised for its softly-softly approach towards the deepening crisis within its northern neighbour, last week said the situation there had reached crisis proportions. "People are dying of starvation," said South African government spokesman Themba Maseko. "It is time for urgent action. We cannot sit with our arms folded." South Africa has been alarmed by raw sewage pouring into the Limpopo, the river that Rudyard Kipling once described as "great, green, greasy and all set about with fever trees", which forms the 200-mile frontier between Zimbabwe and South Africa. The Limpopo, whose waters South Africans drink, bathe in and water their crops with, is now infected with cholera bacteria. People on the South African side of the border are now dying from the disease. The cholera, with the toll of dead and infected increasing daily, is not a random mishap. It is a product of state failure, a direct consequence of decaying municipal infrastructure and a health system that can no longer offer basic services. Last week, Save The Children said starvation in the Zambezi Valley was forcing people to eat meat infected with anthrax. At least three people had been killed by the lethal bacterium. "Many families are so hungry that they are taking meat from carcasses of their dead animals, even if they know it's diseased, and are feeding it to their children," said Save The Children. As the state of emergency got under way, international organisations such as the International Red Cross and Care International began building field latrines and distributing medicines and oral rehydration kits. They took over responsibility from the state-run Zimbabwe National Water Authority for delivering disease-free water and repairing collapsed sewerage pipes. Zimbabwe's cities and towns have gone without fresh tap water for months. Many urban households are unable to use their toilets, which are blocked by backed-up sewage. Parliament and the high court in the capital Harare closed down last month because of a lack of clean water. Many people in Harare are walking more than three miles out of the city to bring back water in plastic containers from community boreholes. When water does flow from taps, people are frightened to use it. "It comes with a heavy smell. Sometimes it's greenish in colour, other times brown," said Tadiwa Chireya, a gardener in Harare's Greendale suburb. "Funerals of people dying of cholera are a common feature of our daily lives," said Tapiwa Hove, who lives in the working-class Harare township of Budiro. "But it seems no-one cares. Sewage is flowing all over. It's like living in hell. "People are dying at an alarming rate. The government denies this, but the reality is there for all to see. And we are thirsty in this land of plenty. Dry taps have become a way of life." In response to the emergency, the WHO in Geneva has sent six cholera experts to Zimbabwe with supplies of rehydration salts and other medicines. "We are in front of a disaster," said WHO's global cholera co-ordinator, Claire-Lise Chaignat. "We won't be able to stop the outbreak like that. It is escalating We know there are pockets where the case fatality rate is up to 50% in rural areas." Amnesty International's secretary-general, Irene Khan, bemoaned the cholera epidemic for adding to a long list of suffering. "It is the latest in a whole series of abuses and violations of the people," she said, citing massive evictions of the urban poor from their homes by Mugabe's police and murderous attacks by Zanu PF militias on dissidents and opposition party activists. Khan asked: "So how much more are these people going to suffer from the Mugabe government?" "Quite a lot more," is the answer, despite a growing chorus from African and international statesmen for Mugabe to be toppled and perhaps be put on trial for crimes against humanity. Mugabe has yet to admit political responsibility for turning Zimbabwe, during the near-30 years he has ruled, from one of Africa's most prosperous countries into a failed state. Zimbabwe, which was once a food exporter, is completely laid low. A lethal mix of disease, hunger, unimaginable inflation running officially at more than 231,000,000% (though in reality is many times higher), decayed infrastructure and flight abroad of qualified people has crippled the country. Cholera and anthrax have come on top of an HIV/Aids epidemic that has left Zimbabweans with the lowest life expectancies in the world - 34 years for women and 37 for men. Mugabe continues to blame all of Zimbabwe's crises on Western sanctions, which he says are aimed at "regime change". However, the limited sanctions imposed in the wake of electoral fraud and state violence are targeted purely at the president and his close associates and consist of travel bans and a freeze on their foreign assets. "We've gone from some of the best healthcare in Africa to people dying because they are living in their own sewage," said a doctor from Harare's Parirenyatwa Hospital, once one of the finest in Africa, but now closed with burst pipes leaking into its darkened operating theatres. "And the people who run this country act as if it has nothing to do with them or what they've done to this country." The sheer ruthlessness of Mugabe and his "securocrat" elite is constantly underestimated. It has almost been forgotten that nine months ago Mugabe and Zanu PF actually lost the presidential and parliamentary elections. Morgan Tsvangirai, leader of the opposition Movement for Democratic Change (MDC), won the presidential poll, but not with the 50% plus one vote majority necessary to avoid a run-off election in June. The run-off never took place because police, soldiers and Mugabe's Zanu PF militias launched a crackdown in which hundreds of government opponents were killed. Tsvangirai, rather than see more people killed and maimed, withdrew and Mugabe declared himself re-elected president unopposed. But this time Zimbabwe had collapsed so absolutely that Mugabe and the top military and police officers who effectively run the country could not reverse the decline. Analysts said Zimbabwe was no longer going downhill but had finally plunged over the cliff. John Robertson, Zimbabwe's leading economist, who has carefully monitored the decline, last week said that since Mugabe declared himself re-elected, the real inflation rate had climbed until in November it reached 1.6 sextillion percent - that's 21 zeros - a number Robertson says has lost any meaning. It is impossible to work with it and where possible Zimbabweans now use US dollars. In September, South Africa's then president Thabo Mbeki brokered an equivocal power-sharing deal under which Mugabe, despite his March defeat, would remain president and Tsvangirai would become prime minister with ministries shared between Zanu PF and the MDC. Power-sharing looks permanently stalled because Mugabe has refused to cede control of the Police Ministry to the MDC. This was proven essential last week when 15 police gunmen kidnapped prominent civic leader Jestina Mukoko, director of the Zimbabwe Peace Project (ZPP, from her home in a pre-dawn raid. The ZPP documents human rights abuses. Mukoko, a former television personality, was taken away still wearing her nightdress. She was not allowed to collect her shoes and spectacles. Zimbabwe's top human rights lawyer Beatrice Mtetwa and Zimbabwe Lawyers For Human Rights have been searching police stations around Harare, but have been unable to find the ZPP leader. Mtetwa said the high court refused to consider an urgent application concerning Mukoko's disappearance. "This is the second case I have had to deal with recently in which the judiciary played games," said the lawyer. "The other case was when MDC activist Tonderai Ndira known as "Zimbabwe's Steve Biko" was abducted after the March election." Ndira's body was later found decomposing in Parirenyatwa Hospital. His eyes had been gouged and his tongue cut out. There were bullets in his chest. "If any proof is required to demonstrate that the rule of law has completely broken down in Zimbabwe, this Mukoko's is the case," said Mtetwa. Following Mukoko's kidnap, Archbishop Desmond Tutu, South Africa's Nobel Peace Prize laureate, said Mugabe must either resign or be removed by force. "The world must say, You have been responsible with your cohorts for gross violations and you are going to face indictment in The Hague unless you step down,'" said the archbishop, renowned for his outspoken criticism of the apartheid government in South Africa. "Mugabe has destroyed a wonderful country. A country that used to be a bread basket has now become a basket case." Political analyst Moeletsi Mbeki, brother of Thabo Mbeki, said it would be simple for South Africa's military, despite its current weakened state, to invade Zimbabwe and overthrow Mugabe. "Zimbabwe's army, like all modern armies, runs on armoured vehicles and all the oil that goes into Zimbabwe comes through South Africa," he said. "The reality is that if South Africa wanted a conflict, it would force the Zimbabweans military out of their military vehicles just by cutting off the diesel." However, there is no evidence that South Africa has the will to topple the Mugabe government. And the deep fear being whispered by nearly everyone involved in the international effort to control the cholera epidemic is that once their task is complete Mugabe will claim credit and reinforce his steel grip on Zimbabwe. Date Posted: Thursday 04-Dec-2008 Oxfam warned Thursday that Zimbabwe's cholera epidemic posed a "grave danger" to 300,000 people already weakened by food shortages, as the government declared a national emergency over the crisis. Government and UN figures show more than 560 deaths and 12,500 recorded cases of cholera, but the international aid agency warned the situation was set to get much worse unless international donors stepped in. "More then 300,000 people already seriously weakened by lack of food are in grave danger from the cholera epidemic," it said in a statement. Britain, Zimbabwe's former colonial ruler, announced a 10-million-pound emergency aid package Thursday to provide life-saving assistance and respond to the escalation of cholera.
Peter Mutoredzanwa, country director for Oxfam in Zimbabwe, said such aid pledges would "make a real difference" but more was needed to avert disaster. "Unless the international community steps up to provide money for food and medical assistance immediately, the already dire situation will get much worse," he said. "With close to half the population weakened by serious food shortages, cholera when it hits is even more likely to be lethal. "Indications are that more than five million people will urgently need food aid by January." In unusually frank remarks from Zimbabwe's government, the state-run Herald newspaper said Thursday the cholera outbreak and the breakdown of the health system were national emergencies and appealed for international aid.
From AFP, 4 December 2008
Source: ZWNEWS - 5 December 2008 Date Posted: Friday 05-Dec-2008 Harare - My home intercom rang and a tiny voice asked: "Please, sir, may I kindly have some water?" The request comes several times a day, and my neighbours' children or servants roll in with battered wheelbarrows full of 20L plastic canisters, buckets, aluminium pots and anything else that can hold liquid. For the past five weeks, not a drop of water has come into the Harare suburb where I live via the water treatment system set up 50 years ago. But I am a boon to the neighbourhood. I have a borehole and a pump that sucks clean, cool water out of the earth. More importantly, I don't charge. When the water crisis first crept up on the city about two years ago, people offered to pay me. Now, with the supply cut off, I and others with boreholes have become "water Samaritans". An Asian businessman has had a tap installed in an elaborate bricked fountain outside his front wall with a large sign saying: "Drinking water. Help yourself."
On Monday, for the first time, the whole of Harare's water supply broke down after running out of purifying chemicals. "I was up in my office on the 10th floor and there was nothing to drink and the toilets blocked and stinking," said Basil, a banker. "I was as helpless as if I were lost in the bush." The water crisis is yet another legacy of President Robert Mugabe's rule. In 2005, his Zanu PF party stripped municipal authorities run by the opposition Movement for Democratic Change of control of urban water and sewerage services and set up the Zimbabwe National Water Authority (Zinwa). It was bankrupt almost from the start and had few skilled staff. Water shortages set in rapidly, and now nearly every part of this modern city of about two million suffers continual water cuts, from up to a few hours a day to two years, in one township.
The authority had to stop pumping on Monday because it ran out of aluminium sulphate to treat Harare's water, which comes from Lake Chivero just west of the city. Every day, about 35 tonnes of raw effluent is pumped from Zinwa's sewage works, which has now collapsed, into the lake. People have learnt to cope. It is easier in the suburbs, where many have boreholes. The water of thousands of swimming pools is scooped out in buckets to flush toilets. Manufacturers cannot produce enough large plastic water tanks. Norma is one of the unlucky ones who live in a bad area. She is forced to rotate between her friends who have water, dropping in at sunset with a towel, soap and shampoo. She calls it "social bathing". Gertrude, a nurse, carries in the boot of her car two large canisters and a collection of plastic bottles that she fills up when she makes home calls on patients.
Harare Sports Club allows members to shower in its changing rooms, but was overwhelmed during Monday's disaster. Members were notified that henceforth they would be charged $US2 ($3.10) for a shower. In the townships, the water turns in a deadly cycle. Months without it mean that toilets are blocked, leading to people defecating in the open, everywhere, at night. At the same time, the pressure of the trapped sewage is enough to flip open cast-iron manhole covers and spew the contents through the streets, into people's yards. The stench of faeces is all-pervasive. The main water supply now comes from thousands of shallow wells dug in people's tiny backyards, where people queue to fill 20L chigubus (canisters) at an extortionate $US1 a time. The wells are seldom protected, so the effluent runs straight in.
"This was a modern township, with a functioning reticulated system that pumped clean, safe water into the taps and toilets of every home," said Pete, an engineer. "Now people are queueing up at primitive hand pumps, like rural villages. Civilisation has gone in reverse." Some people take a pickaxe to a Zinwa pipeline, and collect the escaped water where it gathers in a pool, supplemented by trickles of sewage. It has been like this for years, in nearly every poor, crowded township in the country, and inevitably cholera has struck. In two months, more than 11,000 cases have been reported. The number doubled last week and 565 people have died in the outbreak, the Government said, declaring a national emergency yesterday. A senior Western diplomat said the true toll of the epidemic could be double the official figure. He accused Mugabe's regime of "criminal and politically driven neglect" of Zimbabwe's water and sewerage system.
By: Jan Raath
Comment from The Times (UK), 5 December 2008
Source: ZWNEWS - 5 December 2008 Did you catch that? He said "Civilization has gone in reverse!" This is the result when government goes from White to Black There are no White farmers left in Zimbabwe None
for more information visit http://www.africancrisis.co.za/
************************** Haiti Christopher Columbus "found" Haiti in 1492. There were Taino, an Arawakan people on the island. But smallpox and other European diseases practically wiped them out, probably the worst case of depopulation in the Americas. What disease didn't kill, forced labor did. The small number of Tainos who survived moved into the mountains in an attempt to survive. So needing laborers for the sugar and coffee plantations, the Spaniards imported African slaves. The French came in 1664. Under the Treaty of Ryswick in 1697 Spain officially ceded the western third of Hispaniola to France. By that time they were growing tobacco, indigo, cotton and cacao. African slaves were the work force. After several slave insurrections some slaves escaped into the mountains where they were met by the last of the Taino natives. After either killing or intermarrying with them, the last of the full-blooded Arawakan population on the island was extinct. By 1763 sugar and coffee became the major crops. In 1767 the island exported 72 million pounds of raw sugar and 51 million pounds of refined sugar, one million pounds of indigo (pea like plant harvested for its blue dye), and two million pounds of cotton. It was one of the richest colonies in the 18th century French empire, known as the "Pearl of the Antilles." This single colony, about the size of Maryland, produced more sugar and coffee than all of Britain's West Indian colonies combined. And who provided the labor? About 790,000 African slaves who made up at least one third of the entire Atlantic slave trade between the years 1783 to 1791. These slaves were ruled over by a white population that in 1789 numbered only 32,000. At all times, a majority of slaves in the colony were African-born since conditions were brutal so this prevented the slaves from increasing naturally. As a result, African culture remained strong, including Vodou (VooDoo). Thousands of slaves fled into the mountains to gain their freedom. They formed communities of maroons (fugitive runaway) and raided isolated plantations, killing thousands of whites. 
On August 22, 1791, slaves in the northern region of the colony staged a revolt. Tradition marks the beginning of the revolution at a VooDoo ceremony with a VooDoo priest issuing the call to arms. Within hours the northern plantations were in flames and the rebellion had spread through the entire colony. In 1792 the French attempted to gain control by sending Sonthonax. By August, 1793 they took the radical step of proclaiming freedom to the slaves in the north province with emancipation to the rest by October. The colonists, joined by many of the free men of color who opposed the abolition of slavery, looked to Britain for assistance. In 1794 Sonthonax would leave Haiti but not before arming the former slaves. Suddenly the rebel slaves were a military force and by 1801 they were in control of the whole island after conquering the Spanish side and proclaiming the abolition of slavery there. Even though Napoleon Bonaparte attempted to regain control, he was unsuccessful. French troops were slaughtered by the thousands but not before committing heinous acts of their own. On January 1, 1801 independence was declared. The name Haiti was chosen, Taino for "Land of Mountains." Most of the remaining French colonists fled. Those who remained were slaughtered, about 2,000. The black leader of the massacre issued a proclamation declaring, "we have repaid these cannibals, war for war, crime for crime, outrage for outrage." The blacks had their victory. No Whites remained on Haiti. Results of Black Rule in Haiti Since 1801 Haiti has been an independent republic, considered the world's oldest black republic and the second-oldest republic in the Western Hemisphere after the United States. Their first constitution, enacted in 1804, stated that: - 1. Freedom of Religion;
- 2. All citizens of Haiti, regardless of skin color, to be known as "Black" (this was an attempt to eliminate the multi-tiered racial hierarchy which had developed in Haiti, with full-blooded Europeans at the top, various levels of light to brown skin in the middle, and dark skinned "Kongo" from Africa at the bottom).
- 3. White men were forbidden from possessing property or domain on Haitian soil. Should the French return to re-impose slavery, Article 5 of the constitution declared: "At the first shot of the warning gun, the towns shall be destroyed and the nation will rise in arms."
The military leader who was responsible for the independence of Haiti declared himself Emperor Jacques I. He was then assassinated in 1806 en route to battle rebels in his regime. It's been downhill ever since. 
Jean-Jacques Dessalines, leader of the Haitian revolution and the first ruler of independent Haiti
|
In order to up production and pay off national debt, the government of Haiti enacted farming codes in 1826. These failed because peasant freeholders, mostly former revolutionary solders, considered it "forced labor" and refused to return to that way of life. By 1840, Haiti had ceased to export sugar entirely, although large amounts continued to be grown for local consumption as taffia-a raw rum. However, Haiti continued to export coffee, which required little cultivation and grew semi-wild. By the early 1900s the country was in disorder and debt. And the United States didn't help by meddling with the banking system in order to gain some control. Between 1911 and 1915, a series of political assassinations and forced exiles saw the presidency of Haiti change six times. The country was in such disarray that German nationals controlled about 80 percent of the country's international commerce and Germans had a lot of control in the country. This made the United States nervous since we had Jews whispering in our ear and we didn't like Germans. In an effort to limit German influence, in 1910-1911 the State Department backed a consortium of American investors from the National City Bank of New York, Jewish money men, in acquiring control of Haiti's only commercial bank and the government treasury. In February of 1915, Jean Vilbrun Guillaume Sam became dictator, by July, facing a revolt, he massacred 167 political prisoners, all of whom were from elite families. Sam was then lynched. This was just the excuse the Jewish bankers needed to convince President Wilson to invade. After all, the uprising threatened "American" business interests. On November 17, 1915, Woodrow Wilson sent in the United States Marines. For the next nineteen years, advisers of the United States governed the country, enforced by the U.S. Marine Corps. Although this occupation was mainly for our own self-interests, while there the United States did build a massive road system, improve the infrastructure including 189 bridges, irrigation canals and hospitals, schools and public buildings. Drinking water was brought to the main cities, all under the jurisdiction of the United States Marines. Reforms were carried out, corruption was reduced, and public health, education and agriculture developed. Yet it was all in vain. The Marines left in 1934 and it didn't take Haiti long to revert to their African way of life. One corrupt ruler after another became part of Haiti's history. By the 1950s, when Duvalier was in charge, the Marines were back again, retraining and reorganizing the Haitian Army in hopes that Haiti wouldn't become communist. And again, the Marines rebuilt the public works and policed the citizen while developing an army for the Haitian people. When the Marines left, the country yet again reverted back to their African roots. By 1994, the United States Army was back in Haiti to restore the "duly elected government" in "Operation Uphold Democracy." You can take the African out of the jungle, but you can't take the jungle out of the African One corrupt leader after another has brought Haiti to it's present condition as the poorest nation in the Americas. Fraud is rampant, the unemployment rate is around 50%, more than 80% live below the poverty line and if it wasn't for the United Nations, Haitians would starve to death. Even with their help, Haitians go hungry. | An April 18, 2008 article by the New York Times describes it best: QUOTE: In Haiti, vendors are selling flavored mud to starving people.In Haiti, where three-quarters of the population earns less than $2 a day and one in five children is chronically malnourished, the one business booming amid all the gloom is the selling of patties made of mud, oil and sugar, typically consumed only by the most destitute. “It’s salty and it has butter and you don’t know you’re eating dirt,” said Olwich Louis Jeune, 24, who has taken to eating them more often in recent months. “It makes your stomach quiet down.” |
Every year around 38,000 children under the age of five die - almost one out of three because of malnutrition 
Venecia Lonis, age 4 Doctors Without Borders hospital |
More than half of Haiti's women suffer from anemia which causes fatigue, shortness of breath and vertigo. It is often the result of a diet poor in iron as well as worm infestation and malaria 
This woman scrounges for food in a junkyard Her ancestors should be ashamed of themselves |
Haiti is the only country in the Americas on the United Nations list of least developed countries. Not even Cuba is on the list! Economic growth was nevative in 2001 and 2002, flat in 2003. It's consistently ranked among the most corrupt countries in the world. Foreign aid makes up approximately 40% of the government budget with the largest donor being the United States followed by Canada and the European Union. Half the people are illiterate and of those who do enter school, less than 30% reach 6th grade. After 200 years of self rule, this is what you get a people incapable of ruling Black Rule -- White Rule Which do you prefer? ************************** UPDATE: On January 12, 2010, a devastating earthquake hit Haiti, killing over 200,000 people and leaving hundreds of thousands more homeless The suffering is heartbreaking The outpouring of aid from around the world, mainly White countries, has been tremendous Yet the Haitians continue to do what their race does best Exploit each other Even when their fellow man is dying of hunger, they will exploit and steal from each other for more information visit http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/haiti.htm ************************** United States of America Surprised to see the United States on this page? You shouldn't be. After all, as of the writing of this page, Barak Obama, a mulatto, is the President of the United States. It remains to be seen what the future will hold for our country. Consider Obama's "accomplishments" just in his first year: Obama is the first president never to attend any Christmas celebration - part of our White Christian Heritage Obama is the first president in 110 years to miss the annual army/navy football game Obama is the first president to stay on vacation following a terrorist attack or an attempted terrorist attack Change you can believe in Our culture and Heritage are under attack and Obama is just the puppet dancing on a string of Jewish control The Jews are wondering, how much will White America accept before they stop us Letting in the Mexicans to "darken" up our country is just part of the Jewish plan 
This is from an ad campaign running in Mexico What an "absolut" or "perfect" world would look like Oh yes, they have plans for our country! Wake Up! -- Wake Up! -- Wake Up! As we wait to see what else will develop, the following is very enlightening: Jared Taylor, November 14, 2008The presidential election of 2008 brings to mind another vote that took place 16 years ago in South Africa: the referendum in which whites voted to turn power over to blacks. Though it has long been overshadowed by the 1994 general elections that brought the African National Congress (ANC) to power, it was the referendum of March 17, 1992, that ended white rule. By 1992, President F. W. de Klerk and his National Party government had repealed all the major apartheid laws. The ANC had been unbanned, and Mr. de Klerk had started discussions with Mr. Mandela on a new constitution that would enfranchise blacks and “share power.” Andries Treurnicht and his Conservative party led the opposition to these negotiations, saying the president had no authority to negotiate a new constitution. Mr. de Klerk decided to put the question to the people. If he won the referendum, he would push on to a new constitution; if he lost, he would resign and call a general election. The referendum asked the following question: “Do you support continuation of the reform process which the State President began on February 2, 1990, and which is aimed at a new constitution through negotiation?” (It was on February 2, 1990, that Mr. de Klerk announced the unbanning of the ANC and the release of Mr. Mandela from prison.) The National Party—the traditional party of the Afrikaners—mounted a massive campaign for a “yes” vote, warning that a “no” would mean more international sanctions and black violence. One of its campaign posters was of an armed member of the Afrikaner Resistance Movement—a militant white organization—with the slogan, “You can stop this man! Vote YES.” In other words, the real menace for South Africa was a white man with a gun. The Conservative Party, which campaigned for a “no” vote, warned that “power sharing” was just another name for black rule, and that whites had the right and the duty to govern themselves. How did the people of the Great Trek, the Battle of Blood River, and the Boer War vote? They feared international isolation more than they feared black rule; whites voted 68 to 31 percent for “continuation of the reform process.” Nor was this a decision forced upon Afrikaners by white English-speakers. Though some militant groups boycotted the referendum, all election analysts agree that a majority of Afrikaners voted “yes,” and some even believe there was more support among Afrikaners than British South Africans. Whites therefore had the chance to keep their country, but gave it away. That vote ensured the ANC victory of 1994 and everything that has followed. American whites are not quite as eager as the South Africans were. In the November 4 election, only 43 percent voted for black rule—pardon me, for Barack Obama. Fifty-five percent of whites wanted John McCain to be their president but it was blacks and Hispanics who got the president they wanted, not whites. Every year, as the number of non-whites increases, whites will have less say about who rules them. Entirely aside from politics or questions of competence or experience, the election of a president most whites did not want is a jarring symbol of lost autonomy. If their numbers continue to decline, whites will not get the schools, the neighborhoods, the culture—and ultimately, the country—they want. Perhaps it is because whites have brought diminished status upon themselves that we are expected to take pride in it rather than fight to reverse it. As Paul Krugman explained helpfully in the New York Times, “If the election of our first African-American president didn’t stir you, if it didn’t leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there’s something wrong with you.” This means there is something wrong with at least 55 percent of whites, but that has been the Times’s position for years. Mr. Krugman’s joy in Mr. Obama’s victory is shared by whites all around the world. “We have great hopes that we are standing at the dawn of a new era,” wrote the Norwegian daily Aftenposten. “One Giant Step for Mankind” read the front page of England’s Sun newspaper. A headline on the London Telegraph website declared: “Barack Obama Victory Allows Britain to Love US Again.” The Times modestly headlined its election story, “The New World.” Prime Minister Stephen Harper of Canada spoke of Mr. Obama’s “tremendous, historic” victory, and the Toronto Sun called it “an historic milestone like no other.” Le Monde in Paris noted that “from Left to Right, [French] politicians have been competing for superlatives with which to praise the election of Barack Obama.” Milan’s Corriere della Sera wrote that Mr. Obama was “the man who can save America from utter breakdown.” This chorus of rejoicing has eerie parallels to how the world’s whites welcomed black rule in South Africa. In 1993, Mr. Mandela and Mr. de Klerk shared the Nobel Peace Prize for their new, “power-sharing” constitution. Mary McGrory of the Washington Post gushed only slightly more than most when she wrote in her May 12, 1994 column that “Nelson Mandela has won what the [Washington] Post calls ‘one of history’s sweetest victories over racial subjugation’ and he is going to keep it clean and beautiful so that newspaper readers will think they are reading scripture when they read dispatches from South Africa that cannot be read except through tears.” Fourteen years later—just 14 years later—does anyone have second thoughts? Under white rule, South Africa was climbing steadily in the UN’s Human Development Index. It reversed course the first year of black rule and has dropped ever since. South Africa can no longer keep accurate crime statistics, but it is unquestionably one of the most dangerous places on earth. Anyone who can afford to lives in a private fortress, and carjacking is so common it is considered foolish to stop at a red light after dark. Amazon.com limits shipping to South Africa because postal workers steal so many packages. Interpol reports that South Africa has the highest rape rate in the world—and the highest AIDS rate. About one-fifth of South African men admit they have raped a woman, and an estimated 35 percent of the armed forces have AIDS. Race preferences for blacks are so ruthless that approximately 50 percent of white men are self-employed and nearly a million whites have emigrated, most citing crime and race preferences. Surely, not even Mary McGrory would think this sounds like the Book of Matthew. And how about Mr. de Klerk? Would he not give up a hundred Nobel Peace Prizes for a country in which his grandchildren could be safe and proud? Of course, our election is different from the South African referendum but the effect is the same: Whites are placing their destinies in the hands of others. The South Africans did it suddenly; we are doing it gradually. Let us hope whites all over the world save their newspapers from November 5, 2008, with their extravagant headlines and dizzy hopes. Let them reread them 10 or 15 years from now—and let them think of South Africa. from http://www.zasucks.com/?p=858 For more articles written by Taylor see http://vdare.com/taylor/index.htm |
Truth is not Racist Facts are not Hate Time to wake up and Save Our Precious Heritage! Save Your Heritage! |
